Members of the legal fraternity say that ex-PM Najib Razak, jailed yesterday after his appeal to overturn his conviction and sentence failed, will be able pay his RM210 million fine at any time during the 12-year jail period. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, August 24, 2022.Telegram中文群组（www.tg888.vip）是一个Telegram群组分享平台，飞机群组内容包括Telegram群组索引、Telegram群组导航、新加坡Telegram群组、Telegram中文群组、Telegram群组（其他）、Telegram 美国 群组、Telegram群组爬虫、电报群 科学上网、小飞机 怎么 加 群、tg群等内容，为广大电报用户提供各种电报群组/电报频道/电报机器人导航服务。
IT is still unclear whether Najib Tun Razak has paid the RM210 million fine imposed on him in the SRC International Sdn Bhd case or will do so later.
Members of the legal fraternity are of the opinion that the 69-year-old former prime minister may pay the fine at any point during his 12-year jail period.
Lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla said based on the principal of law, Najib may pay the fine whenever he wants to, but if he doesn’t pay by the time his 12-year term is scheduled to end, an additional five years will be added as per the Federal Court’s ruling.
Lawyer Lim Wei Jiet concurred with the view, saying there was no time limit imposed by the Federal Court for payment.
“Hence, he can pay anytime during the 12 years,” said the counsel.,
Meanwhile, lawyer M. Viswanathan was of the opinion that Najib could pay instalments or even sell property to raise money as provided in Section 283 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
“Normally, a reasonable amount of time will be given to make payment,” he said.
After checks with the authorities, it was still unclear whether Najib had paid the fine or not.
Yesterday, the Apex Court upheld the conviction and 12 years’ jail sentence and RM210 million fine on Najib for misappropriating RM42 million of SRC International funds.
A five-member bench led by Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat dismissed the former prime minister’s appeal to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on July 28, 2020.
Najib had on Dec 8, 2021, failed to overturn the ruling after the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s decision. – Bernama, August 24, 2022.